The speech of incinerators, topical theme and a strong social impact, is large and complex and must not exclude any party.
In an area the political choices are made by the body which must necessarily take into account the technical and scientific evaluation that are not from the political world not to be and is neither technical nor scientific.
The policy must provide services to citizens that do not violate rights to health and on this principle can not and should not even give the benefit of the doubt. Building incinerators
just because we have the illusion that the waste will be destroyed so it makes us forget the basic principle of chemistry, according to which nothing is destroyed, but simply transformed into something else.
If the waste after burning, they become toxic waste that the people, animals and plants breathe compromising their health and that of descendants, are still so convinced that they can apply this solution to the waste problem?
In my opinion, therefore, the incinerator, monitored and equipped with the most effective filters, regardless of the costs of maintenance, to abbot in the final phase could take the waste is not treated differently, but the most effective solution to the problem of waste passing through two other points: 1
- must be placed on the market goods at the end of their useful life can be totally recyclable
2 - that is done, the actual collection and recycling waste.
Any other solution would look unnatural, ineffective and damaging.
0 comments:
Post a Comment