I wonder if the policy proposals are, like, personal views amplified by the media, without a screen or real technical and scientific programs evaluated in detail (Feasibility and the short, medium and long term).
What causes my reflection?
Our political representatives, very good to send their safety in what they say, in light of the many social conflicts that often are the workhorse of political parties (waste disposal, incinerators, gas terminals, immigration, etc..) say they want, right and left, the interest of the nation.
I wonder and wonder who is willing and able to answer: the good of a nation and a people can be reached dall'acclamazione a crowd of more or less informed, more or less restricted? I
remember, as reported by the Holy Scriptures, that the Attorney Pilate asked the crowd between Jesus and Barabbas, who was to be pardoned for Easter and the crowd asked for Barabbas to grace the murderess, decreeing the crucifixion to the right.
So if the majority wants the incinerators how do you prove that this is the right way?
If the majority decides that incinerators should not be made and how those who can demonstrate that this decision is the best?
I believe that politics in the life of a country is necessary and indispensable.
however, needs the continued support of the competent authority for each focus area, recognized by the appropriate bodies, autonomous and independent from national politics.
Now, to close the circle and give without any logic to this monologue, explain that the above stems mainly from two stories: A
news on evidence of the amount of dioxin in the blood of people far above the maximum tolerated ,
Another news coming from abroad and that of buffalo mozzarella dioxin first rejected by South Korea and later Japan. Emergency
returned because Italy was able to give assurance that controls and limits imposed by law.
appropriate bodies have therefore made a binding opinion, which will save the industry from crisis immediately apparent.
Organisations with their certification reassured that there is no danger from the consumption of buffalo mozzarella from Campania.
We hope that these bodies have decided on autonomy, conscience and competence.
If these advisory bodies are "hostages" of political opinions may not be reliable and consequences ...
What causes my reflection?
Our political representatives, very good to send their safety in what they say, in light of the many social conflicts that often are the workhorse of political parties (waste disposal, incinerators, gas terminals, immigration, etc..) say they want, right and left, the interest of the nation.
I wonder and wonder who is willing and able to answer: the good of a nation and a people can be reached dall'acclamazione a crowd of more or less informed, more or less restricted? I
remember, as reported by the Holy Scriptures, that the Attorney Pilate asked the crowd between Jesus and Barabbas, who was to be pardoned for Easter and the crowd asked for Barabbas to grace the murderess, decreeing the crucifixion to the right.
So if the majority wants the incinerators how do you prove that this is the right way?
If the majority decides that incinerators should not be made and how those who can demonstrate that this decision is the best?
I believe that politics in the life of a country is necessary and indispensable.
however, needs the continued support of the competent authority for each focus area, recognized by the appropriate bodies, autonomous and independent from national politics.
Now, to close the circle and give without any logic to this monologue, explain that the above stems mainly from two stories: A
news on evidence of the amount of dioxin in the blood of people far above the maximum tolerated ,
Another news coming from abroad and that of buffalo mozzarella dioxin first rejected by South Korea and later Japan. Emergency
returned because Italy was able to give assurance that controls and limits imposed by law.
appropriate bodies have therefore made a binding opinion, which will save the industry from crisis immediately apparent.
Organisations with their certification reassured that there is no danger from the consumption of buffalo mozzarella from Campania.
We hope that these bodies have decided on autonomy, conscience and competence.
If these advisory bodies are "hostages" of political opinions may not be reliable and consequences ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment